Monthly Archives: June 2017

This Riff is for the new Blockchain social media site Steemit.com

We’ll see, won’t we?

What a crap day! The first thing I do is try and download the Mycelium app for my iPhone and fuckin’ Apple locks me out of my account and for !@#$ knows how long! Their password protocols suck!
So, okay, I say….WTF! And decide to inhale some CBD/THC 1 to 1 blend and end up doing this for all the boys and girls on Steemit!

It be nice if tomorrow didn’t suck as much as today!

In this Riff-Vlog, I associate the sun and the moon and how they work together in a symbiotic relationship. Everything was going fine until humans came along:D……there is a riff prior to my points:)

 

 

This essay by Paul Kurtz is something I wholeheartedly agree with when it comes to culture; that is secular humanism is the best template for a healthy and productive society. No quarrel whatsoever there but I will add the caveat ( because of the nature of this site) that the foundation of modern secular humanism was and is built on fossil fuels and if they run out it’s by no means a given that things will remain the same. I would also add that secular societies could be overrun by hostile theistic cultures who may have hidden agendas and may wish to undermine secularism; I’m not sure it’s secularism wisest move to dismiss this possibility.

But hey, that’s not really the point of this post which is to examine the framing of his arguments in dismissing theism. My first quibble is that he uses traditional religious narratives as a means of dismissal, which is all well and good as far as it goes but it seems to me, at least, to omit alternative theistic ideas–but again, I agree with his assessment of normative religious narratives. I do this in an attempt to be thorough. I’ve proposed on this site a Gnostic cosmology wherein all religion has been manipulation of humanity by Gnostic Archons. This explains why religion is internally and comparatively contradictory and historically inaccurate; that is to say, that was always the intention of these beings. At the moment I’m not arguing the metaphysics of such beings but rather opining the possibility of this phenomenon. I think this is enough to show weakness in his theorizing. Of course, along with The Archons who can take human form comes the brutality of the universe which they’re partially responsible for bringing into existence (bear with me:). Certainly, Darwinism describes such a hostile and unforgiving existence; at least partially at any rate given specific interpretive parameters.

So briefly, Gnosticism is one alternative possibility and a modern idiosyncratic view of  Gnostic Cosmology is also consistent with modern scientific speculation that this universe is holographic and consciousness is ‘downloadable’. I also consider an alternative Preterist view of The Jesus Story to be possible. This one is much more problematic but deserves a voice, or so I think. In this alternative Christian view, God is Jesus and Satan, or at least; Jesus and Satan are The Right and Left Hand of God. Jesus deals with all truth, beauty and goodness and Satan deals with everything else. Here Jesus and Satan are not enemies but rather administers of human action on this earth. This idea is similar to *The Lords of Karma…..Of course, I don’t know if any of these ideas are true or fallacious but if I hold a theistic view it definitely leans towards AGNOSTIC theism. Now, I’m not saying these ideas are so but I do consider these ideas rational theism but agree there is no empirical test for them….Sheer speculation.

I’ve watched Dr. Strange recently and they espoused a cosmology quite similar to one I proposed on this site. I argued that such ‘features’ would be minimum criteria for any God to be worth its salt. True enough, the movie did make the ideas seem kind of silly but what if the ideas are accurate but not in the ways portrayed in the film? Again, thoroughly speculative but not at all offensive to the faculties of reason, at least not in my opinion, but would understand if others were somewhat more niggardly in their assessment towards such metaphysics. My point here isn’t to assert as fact these speculations but simply to show that not all metaphysics is inherently irrational and illogical.

The last point I would make here is that if ‘the gods’ are agreed not to show themselves in their true form then there would be zero way for humanity to prove their existence. We would only have this ‘nagging’ feeling that something isn’t quite right and truthful on this earth. Ultimately, if any of these ideas were true it would be up to the gods to reveal themselves; until such a time I would wholeheartedly propose that all humans live by the codes laid out in *Kurtz’s paper.

One last note, though, on professional skeptics within secular societies. I find their positive rose-colored glasses worldview more and more problematic. It was quite congruent in the 60’s and 70’s when society really did look to be on a positive arc; society is not in the same condition today….

Pollution, the end of oil with no replacement to scale, the turning over of economy to corrupt casino ethics, the limits to growth, institutionalized amorality, a hostile Islam, a duplicitous and powerful Jewish lobby, Christian Fascism, negative consequences with A.I., these are all enormous and intractable problems which skeptics seem to be dismissing……

NOTE*: to my knowledge, there is no scientific evidence which would give credence to normative Hindu cosmology.

*I also espouse a natural spiritualist cultural view as a solution to the problems civilization faces today. One idea in that direction is naturalist spiritual pantheism.

 

” how dumb can you fuckin’ be!”

This post is on Canada’s new expenditure on the military. This post goes into the details of military and its enormous pollution footprint. Once again the Canadian government proves its duplicity and hypocrisy on the climate issue. Nevermind that Canada has become a 100-year-old experiment in corporate plutocracy using Inverted Totalitarianism as a cultural modus operandi; that is to say, humans are nothing more than objects of financial exploitation in this system and have absolutely zero say when it comes to policy–we are dictated to and usually in the most smirking condescending manner.

It’s amazing to me that the refrain from these elites when it comes to anything positive and altruistic towards humans is, ‘where will the money come from?’; but when it’s something they want there seems to be plenty of money. So there is no money for social education, health-care, ending homelessness (an enormous blight which should be a guaranteed human right), a guaranteed right to quality food, etc. To me, these issues all fall within primary needs in which Maslow expounded. Always broke on these issues, or so it seems in Canada……

Please explore www.positivemoney.org for a solution to these issues…Unfortunately, though, the political class is vetted in Canada, and no one who advocates for these new ideas is allowed a voice!

“let there be fairness for all!”

In my last post called, Pre and Postmodern Christianity, I added a video by, Ann Pettifor. Positive money.org takes on Pettifor in this link, but I do think the quibbles are definitely ‘quibbling’ in the proper direction:) Next is an excerpt from the article:

So once again, the suggestion that our proposals would contract the economy imply either a huge misunderstanding on Ann Pettifor’s part, or that she hasn’t actually read them. Our proposals are about making sure that money is used for something productive, for the public benefit, rather than to inflate property bubbles and flood financial markets. Tackling climate change definitely counts as something in the public benefit. Our proposals would mean that when new money is created, it would be the government rather than the banks that decides how to spend it. Newly created money would get added to the taxes we pay, to be spent into the real economy. Our Sovereign Money paper explains how using this power to create money to build sustainable homes and retrofit existing homes to make them more energy efficient would have been more than 30 times more effective than Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy.

I’m thrilled that there are other people tackling this issue as it hi-lights some of my personal grievances ( the earth has been turned into a financial casino) about the present financial system on the earth; which, I believe, is leading us to ruin and needs to change….

I add this pic because this system is, indeed, playing an exceedingly foolish game of Roulette with the environment.