In this one, I start with a brief overview of philosophies musings on the nation-state from Plato to Hegel to Marx and to where we are now which is what I’ve dubbed ‘left-wing neoliberal communism.’

I briefly touch on religious ideas about the nation-state and offer critique on Judaism and its Messiah trope and cough up a suggestion or two…ahem:P, In short, I think theocracy is the exact wrong way to go…

In the solutions section, I promote the philosophy of EQUALISM …while promoting my ideas like my Four Pillars of a New Earth Commons which suggests taking humanity’s four basic needs of housing, food, education, and health-care off exploitative and coercive capitalist machinations. I also suggest that The Golden Rule as applied to economics should be a part of a healthy nation-state. 

A neo-commons needs a means of exchange that isn’t a toxic debt-riddled mess and needs a new education model premised on acquiring self-sufficiency and mastery within a new appreciation for the family unit wherein economic predation isn’t allowed. So, it would set up the conditions for a healthy foundation for society and the nation-state…

In the end, I align more with right-wing thinking but I’m not silly enough to think that libertarian-ancapistan can solve the problems inherent in the Pareto distribution and human pathology in the economic sphere. So only a wholesale non-predatory span of the commons can get us anywhere near to right-wing economic philosophies…

A similarly themed blog here.

This is part-2 in this series which is my ‘deconstructing’ Tony Kosinec’s 6-hour presentation of Kaballistic metaphysics. The link to his video is in my Youtube video.

My main point of contention was when he called Kabbalah science. This is blatantly dishonest and calls into question the integrity of this oeuvre. If something can’t be falsified it isn’t science and if something can’t be detected or measured then it isn’t demonstrable science.

At best it’s premodern hermeticism…

Like Jihad, if the idea of Israel and the nations were solely esoteric personal phenomenology then I wouldn’t see a problem with this metaphysics regardless of whether any of it is metaphysically accurate or not. It’s when these ideas get played out in the real world of economics and nation-state politics that they become exceedingly problematic. Again, the general idea of a solely spiritual Jihad isn’t necessarily destructive and can possibly lead to good interior insights. But it should never go further than this, in my opinion…

The Kabbalist ‘Maslow hierarchy of stage development’ is interesting but these ideas are way to easy to abuse and the self-deception via rationalizations is endless.

WITH VOX:

Without:

The economics of a kakistocracy might well be called ‘Pelfonomics’…

I’ll introduce the philosophy of Equalism here as expounded by m.c. macq…

Pelfonomics would be the modus operandi of predation economics.

In this video, he talks about the four foundations of contract law:

Good Faith…

Consent…

Full Disclosure…

Mutual Benefit…

One of the primary concerns of any healthy civilization that has been swept off the table of conversation in recent decades is the issue of unmerited wealth. It should be obvious why this happened.

It’s no more important than within the parameters of currency creation or the means of exchange. Who gets to create it and how? And why do they get to create money out of thin air? Why not you? 

Why can’t you do it? And why can they?

The GOOD first! This is a really decent overview of Marxist thought and well worth the time listening to. I commented on what I wrote below and the comment (in italics) was immediately deleted so I’m making a post here. I’ll link the video below.

To my knowledge, there is nothing that I’m saying here that is racist, mean, inaccurate, or historically false–at least from anything I can discover about history.

My comment on his Cultural Marxist video:

It’s a silly idea as long as one is willing to dismiss and remove the Jewish people from their historical context. If we do that, then, yes, the term becomes vague and meaningless if the Jews are just nobodies like any other goyim…
But if we are honest and are willing to place the Jews within their historical context then there is, IMO, some substance to these ideas.
If we are honest we can see three general categories of Jewish influence since about the 1400s. With the first one religious orthodoxy which teaches that the world will eventually be given over to the Jewish Messiah and the renewed Sanhedrin council coming out of Jerusalem with a renewed third temple. This group also includes radical sects like the Sabbatean Frankists…
The esoteric school within Judaism is Kabbalism which encompasses sects like the Freemasons and Jesuits who teach an alternative metaphysics based on the Genesis story and the fall and rape of Sophia (Eve) and the Luciferian attempt to ‘save the world’ via Tikkun Olam. It’s easy to dismiss the influence here since the 1400s but such dismissal is entirely mistaken. See Scott Ostatt’s, Secrets In Plain Sight documentary.
Lastly, the Marxist/Materialist/Rothchild Zionist movements that began in the 1800s which seem to be a form of ‘Secularized Judaism’ or attempts to rid Jewish thought from its spiritual foundation.

And, of course, there are the *demented children of Judaism in Christianity and Islam who, for the most part, will have strong opinions on the Jews both positive and negative.

• I admit to being a tad incorrigible:P