Monthly Archives: April 2022
“In the beginning was the word; and the word was KA$H”
Blogged on easter weekend 2022. I’ll keep adding to this one as time goes by as it’s not yet completed.
Every conclusion arrived at as a result of study of the fragments of information available in respect to money and its creators in the world of the Ancient Civilizations, indicates the existence of a far reaching conspiracy in respect to monetary issuance influencing the progression of man’s history in the earliest times of which written record exists. It is also outstandingly clear that it was parent to that acknowledged and most obvious conspiracy such as exists today.
Money Power was as busy arming the enemies of the people amongst whom it sojourned, as that people themselves.The Babylonian Woe…
This one should get me deleted! Mr. Reed was one of the most celebrated journalists of his time. His postmortem, The Controversy of Zion is as relevant today as it was mid-century and in it he goes into the depths of the HOW? Although shows like HBO’s Boardwalk Empire are also educational entrances in that regard. From his book:
World War III, if it comes, will be coldly calculated and planned rather than accidental”.
But first I think it fitting to link Miles Mathis’ paper on The Kenosha Fake. At this point all I’ll say is Miles made an error in this one; although I concede he has the brains, but I’ve got the heart and this one was about my blog–see Why The Kenosha Fake? It’s worth noting that Ken translates to Cain so this name is exceedingly problematic specifically within the context of spirituality. It was the Cainite/Kenite gnostics that practiced antinomianism and were responsible for the blackwashing of the gnostic schools in antiquity. And make no mistake about how this Cain lineage is interpreted by the Kabbalist’s and the consequences of a terrible hermeneutic for non-jewish people–see below. It’s the usual flip in that these kainite lines are what I call the ‘nephilim archon spooks’ (forget the giant bs) and they became the semitic-line pharaohs in the 18th dynasty. It’s these folks who ‘own everything’. See THIS link that goes in some detail although I’ll do a separate blog on the book From Cain/KENite To Khazaria. I’m posting the link so anyone can explore the ideas associated with these assertions: Cain/Ken. But, in my view, they all have one thing in common: claims to racial specialness via Yahweh. That should be a huge red flag.
The first thing I’ll say about Reed is that I find it hard to believe he didn’t have access to the information about the 18th dynasty which was the root of Judaism as we know it. He does say, in the book, that he knew there was no evidence for the Exodus as written. But he stops there and doesn’t connect that to the fallacies of Christianity–if the *Torah is wrong (it is) then Christianity (and Islam) are wrong also. My sense, and I could be wrong, is that he was arguing from the perspective of what we would call the culture wars today. I won’t comment on his faith. His concern was always framed as concern for the WEST…So his critiques are incredibly relevant and the tribe has replaced him today with their puppet Jordan Peterson–no one shills more for the west than Peterson, but in the ubiquitous flip tactic of the Phoeni CIA n’s–Peterson has partnered up with the tribe–surprise, surprise.
It’s very much worth noting that both Christianity and Islam have two very important things in common: they both teach submission to a political theocratic authority and they both forbid usury–the former laying the foundation for the coming **Noahide Laws. Coincidence? Wrong answer and the latter wiped out any competition that the Babylonian Woe (international banking cartels) might have had. It’s worth noting that the Armana letters in Egypt during the 18th dynasty suggest that it was the emerging bankers that disrupted thousands of years of stability in Egypt. From Astle’s book:
This serious error brought about finally, not only the collapse of that power through whose medium the god kings were best able to serve their peoples, but also as a further consequence, the collapse and fading of the meaning and benevolent purpose of the god kings themselves.
It seems Akhenaten (likely Moses) and Joseph (likely Yuya) were intimately involved in these shenanigans. It’s this hybrid Semitic/Egyptian bloodline descendants that created Israel and the Torah as we know it. It’s no coincidence that the first mention of anything known as Judaism today happened shortly after the 18th dynasty. It’s also important to mention that the Egyptian side of these pharaohs ended up hating the semitic branches and did everything possible to delete them from the records. The Semitic lines responded by ‘borrowing’ the spirituality of Egypt and making the primary tenets of Kemetism the root of their new religion. And, BTW., by the time this bloodline intersected with Plato’s academy it got the idea to ‘create their own reality and history’ and that appears to be exactly what they did–extending their history far beyond its primary roots in the 18th dynasty. And their Solomon who didn’t exist had 700-wives and concubines! Plato’s academy taught them to bullshit quite well…
As a christian gnostic, I obviously hold alternate views to Mr. Reed. Nonetheless, he details a distinction between certain interpretations in the Torah that could be read as universalist but in contradistinction to the racist supremacy of the Levites who had their roots as priests of Kemetism in the Egyptian city of MalLEVI. It’s this priesthood who left Egypt with Akhenaten and created this toxic iteration that he so correctly describes. He’s the only author I’ve come across that pointed out the ‘high-strangeness’ of Germany’s politics that instantiated core aspects of the religion of the Levites. When I first perceived that many years ago it sent a shock through my whole system but at least now I KNOW I’m not alone in my perception. Read, Palestine: The Reality, by J.M.N. Jeffries linked HERE and ask yourself about the coincidence of the timing of Hitler’s policies which mirror the Levite’s view of supremacy tied to land. What Hitler was doing in Gemarny the Zionists were doing in Palestine. No chance that is a random coincidence. He’s also one of the few that perceived the third reich as working with the zionists in a dialectical gambit with communism to achieve the political and economic goals of the Rabbis (Levites)–partly fulfilled in 1948. I’ve just suggested the same thing in my James Lindsay blog. So it appears the same thing is ongoing today. I guess I differ, though, because I suggest there is absolutely nothing redeeming about Judaism from the perspective of Christian Gnostics–Yahweh is the devil and Jesus was not Jewish. So a certain people are caught is a nasty metaphysical Catch-22. I sympathize with Reform Judaism the most but not because of modernity’s atheism.
Their reaction to that Catch-22, it seems, is documented in the book and describes projects of social engineering wherein the gentiles would be taught atheism framed within reason (the epitome and only appropriate avenue of gentile metaphysics)-the best of the gentiles will submit to the Seven Laws of Noah in the end while the chosenite’s will rule over them with an iron rod–apparently the gentiles will rejoice in this delusion–they will own nothing and be happy. So, basically, suggesting that modern materialist philosophies were not random and were used as tools of societal manipulation. It’s interesting to note, as a point of fact, that most all of the evolutionary theorists were members of the cult of the hidden hand–Freemasonry. Certainly, today, Youtube is ubiquitous with this ongoing project. If this is true the moneylending cartels control both christianity (and islam) and all atheist schools in modernity–hence, the pointless and endless Youtube debates ongoing on their social media owned platforms. A big yawn for us Christian Gnostics. And I’ll cough up that I haven’t come across one of these Youtube atheist channels that has even one iota of skepticism about the virus or pandemic while, of course, all embrace the irrational and non-scientific official stories of 911. Which, by the way, is the first day of the year of the ***Egyptian calendar with the first month called Thoth. Again, see my Judaism is Egyptian Spirituality blog as to why this matters. But the point he makes is that both communism and zionism were materialist/atheist projects directed at the gentiles. This had nothing whatsoever to do with investigating the nature of reality in an open and honest way.
Reed is the first person I’ve come across that suggests the oligarchs only politic and need control the top 20% of the social pyramid. I suggested this in my blogs on neoliberalism (the marketplace as god) and the Pareto distribution. He suggests that they know the lower 80% will consistently split the vote so they only need to focus on manipulating the top 20%. I’ve suggested they manufacture consent there by varying programs of ‘free stuff’ known today as avenues of passive income; and yes, this includes the hyper-speculation on homes–please note this is mostly all unmerited wealth and implemented extensively through the pandemic. It’s also grifters teaching grifting and normalizing this bad economic manipulation. To some degree, and it’s hard to gauge, there is an esoteric aspect to this, which has to do with the story of Adam and Eve and correcting the curse of work. In some sense I could get on board with that if the correction wasn’t premised on grift.
From Reed’s book:
Dr. Weizmann adds that this was “an anticipation of the mandate system”, so that today’s student also learns where the notion of “mandates” was born. The idea of ruling conquered territories under a “mandate” bestowed by a self-proclaimed “league of nations” was devised solely with an eye to Palestine.
If that quote holds today then the pandemic shows they now ‘mandated’ the whole earth.
I don’t share his normative notion on America which I can show means ‘beloved land of Egypt’s spirit’…He suggests that America and, especially Texas, was anti anything to do with Europe. I guess, and I get the argument, but the fact is America was created by these same money-lending cartels. But the narratives must have plausible deniability I guess. A distinction I’d make is that there were, of course, some people in the lower pyramid who felt that way but not so much at the apex of american society.
The simultaneous triumphs of Bolshevism in Moscow and Zionism in London in the same week of 1917 were only in appearance distinct events, the identity of their original source has been shown in an earlier chapter, and the hidden men who promoted Zionism through the Western governments also supported the world-revolution. The two forces fulfilled correlative tenets of the ancient Law: “Pull down and destroy . . . rule over all nations”; the one destroyed in the East and the other secretly ruled in the West.
Got that? You bet…and again, the timing of the Spanish Flu in 1918 (CHAI) is unmistakable. I’ve never heard these conversations/discussions/heated arguments so much in my life as I did in the years leading up to the 2020 pandemic. And Ukraine is being used again in the same way Reed documents in his book. Of course this is still all dismissed as conspiracy theory. My retort is that Judaism isn’t conspiracy theory. And that the **bodycount of antichrist far exceeds that of anti-semitism** in the last 100-years–I mean it isn’t even close so we also have the worst reporting/journalism in history. It appears Orwell was a critic, but Orwell was obviously an insider. I’ve blogged on Orwell HERE…
Reed’s work took him to Germany in the 30’s and he was a personal witness to the Reichstag fire in ’33 (note the #). He eventually quit as it became clear to him that his superiors would not publish his view on German society. Important to note that the zionist agenda was failing in those years as more jews were leaving Palestine than arriving. I suspect, also, like me, he looked around at the top brass in Germany and saw it was populated by the tribe (just like my country today)–and he was too savvy to suffer cognitive dissonance over it. He doesn’t say this per se, however, he does document that Russia was packed with jewish elites. He basically said what I’m seeing today: that the fascist right is a manufactured dialectic. In his own words:
When I resigned in 1938 I had a second reason, not present in 1933, for perplexity about the way the press is conducted. In that matter, too, I could only assume that some infatuation worked to distort the truthful picture of events. The outcome of the ensuing war, however, showed that a powerful motive had lain behind this particular misrepresentation.
In the case of “the Jewish persecution” in Germany I found that impartial presentation of the facts gradually gave way to so partisan a depictment that the truth was lost. This transformation was effected in three subtle stages. First the persecution of “political opponents and Jews” was reported; then this was imperceptibly amended to “Jews and political opponents”; and at the end the press in general spoke only of “the persecution of Jews”. By this means a false image was projected on to the public mind and the plight of the overwhelming majority of the victims, by this fixing of the spotlight on one group, was lost to sight. The result showed in 1945, when, on the one hand, the persecution of Jews was made the subject of a formal indictment at Nuremberg, and on the other hand half of Europe and all the people in it were abandoned to the selfsame persecution, in which the Jews had shared in **their small proportion to populations everywhere**.
Reed was only off by a year:
From this moment neither the top-line politicians, if they rebelled, nor the hard-pressed responsible officials had the power to prevent Zionism from planting in Palestine a time-bomb which may yet blow up the second half of the 20th Century. ME: Sept. 11, 2001 was the beginning of the next phase. There was a Ka-Boom that day.
He documents the tactics used in America in the 20th century. Jewish think-tanks took over government policy; mass immigration as a means to destroy cohesiveness ; and total control of all media wherein any critique of what they were up to was met with all kinds of miserable fates.
The point? These ruling elites didn’t rule via supernaturalism; they’ve ruled via control of currency creation. Read Reed’s book and show me where there was any supernaturalism responsible for everything he documents. There wasn’t; they got to rule via the money-power.
I just have to post this from Jeffries book linked above:
The situation of Palestine, in fact, became that of a man whom a benefactor knocks down with a motor-car, so that he may not be able “to stand by himself.” Whereon the benefactor, leaving the car, rushes to uphold the victim and to guide his faltering steps with devotion. This is uncanny as I’ve been saying for nearly 30-years that the oligarchs want Nobel Prizes for calling an ambulance after they break your legs!
The crux arrives with “civil rights.” What are “civil rights”? All turns on this point. If civil rights remain undefined it is only a mockery to guarantee them. To guarantee anything, and at the same time not to let anyone know what it is, that is Alice in Wonderland legislation. “I guarantee your civil rights,” said the White Queen to Alice in Palestine-land. “Oh, thank you!” said Alice, “what are they, please?” “I’m sure I can’t tell you, my dear,” said the White Queen, “but I’ll guarantee very hard.”
THE QUESTION SHOULD BE ASKED ABOUT CANADA TODAY…The new Palestine for anyone critical of economic crime committed by our governments.
Reed was documenting OUR political clown world theatre today in the 50’s. The last true Republican Nationalist was TAFT. Zion occultism now chooses every candidate .
The prospect which then opened was that if Mr. Eisenhower, instead of Senator Taft, could obtain the party’s nomination, the Republican Party would through him be committed to pursue the Democratic policy of “internationalism” begun by Presidents Woodrow Wilson, Roosevelt and Truman. That, in turn, meant that if the party-leader could be ousted the American elector would be deprived of any genuine choice, for the only man who offered him an alternative, different policy was Senator Taft.
This had been made plain, to the initiated, more than a year before the election by the Republican leader next in importance to Senator Taft, Governor Thomas E. Dewey of New York State. Mr. Dewey (who had astonished himself and the country by losing the 1948 presidential election to Mr. Truman, a classic example of the foredoomed failure of the “me too” method) stated, “I am an internationalist. That’s why I am for Eisenhower. Eisenhower is a Republican at heart, but more important than that, he is an internationalist” (Look, Sept. 11, 1951). Among initiates “internationalist” (like “activist” in Zionism) is a keyword, signifying many unavowed things; thus far in our century no avowed “internationalist” in a frontal post has genuinely opposed the advance of Communism, the advance of Zionism, and the world-government project towards which these two forces convergingly lead. Senator Taft, on the other hand, was violently attacked at this time as an “isolationist” (another key-word; it means only that the person attacked believes in national sovereignty and national interest, but it is made to sound bad in the ear of the masses).
Thus Mr. Eisenhower offered himself at the Republican Party convention at Chicago in 1952 in opposition to Senator Taft. I was an eye-witness, through television, and, although no novice, was astonished by the smoothness with
 which Senator Taft’s defeat was achieved. This event showed, long before the actual election, that the nomination-mechanism had been so mastered that neither party could even nominate any but a candidate approved by powerful selectors behind the scene. The outcome of the presidential election itself is in these circumstances of relatively little account in America today, nor can the observer picture how the Republic might escape from this occult control. It is not possible for either party to nominate its party-leader, or any other man, unless he has been passed as acceptable to “the internationalists” beforehand.
One of the things that I’d contest in Reed’s book is the assertion that the jews somehow (magically) became the slave advisors to any nation that was in power at any given time. Frankly this sounds like bullshit to me and I’d cough up a Miles saying: ‘how stupid do they think we are?’ Apply Occam’s Razor: they were given privileged positions in host nation-states because murderous thugs agreed that they were obviously gods chosen people or because they held the secret keys to power–MONEY and how to manipulate it. There’s only one correct answer folks! And it may very well be more than that. Search some pictures of Alexander The Great and look closely at his features: Semitic without doubt. And know that the Phoenician script became the Greek script and very much more than that. It’s more likely Alexander got to Jerusalem and said, ‘my god…my bro’s!’…So no need to slaughter there but rather a ‘you’re hired!’…
NOTE*: I don’t see anyway around the Torah being false from our knowledge today unless cosmology and modern physics are wrong (as well as evolution and history). There are syncretists who argue it’s all esoteric code but the bodycount of the big 3 over 3500 years is dismal–so, it makes the esoteric code ideas somewhat indigestible in my view.
NOTE**: civilization is witnessing the dialectic in action today as we have a problem! CIA agents of the moneylending cartels are telling us they identify as fluffy smurfs and want the whole political establishment to annihilate both common sense and sound understanding of societal norms. The solution of course will be brought about by the levite rabbis who will fix this madness via implementing worldwide Noahide Laws. Miles is correct when he says another aspect of these programs is to blackwash true freedom and liberalism (oppression from political tyranny) so as to move the centre to the corporate fascist right. Okay, years in and I still can’t get any atheist to take my Atheist Pledge which asks them to pledge to reject the world messiah if he shows even a hint of ass-holery–which in this blog means any negative views towards the gentiles. And BTW: many schools of Judaism now say this messiah will come in a wholly natural way with no supernatural manifestations. It seems really sketchy to me as the Torah is, at minimum, a treatise on supernaturalism.
NOTE***: This is a conversion date from the Egyptian calendar to the Gregorian. More on this issue HERE. Oh, and interesting to note the astrotheology of 12 from 1933 to 1945 and from our crash of 2008 to the virus of 2020.
This is as fine a synopsis one will find on Russia today. At some point I’ll blog on Keith Woods but not now.
*But first I’ll link THIS book by Douglas Reed, called The Controversy Of Zion My blog on Reed HERE ). It’s critical to understanding what is happening on earth today. Dugin’s philosophy can’t be understood correctly unless this book is understood. This knowledge was becoming commonplace about 100-years ago but wars and a pandemic buried these understandings in the 20th century which was a production of FOX…Maybe you can see the utility of wars and pandemic for the religious oligarchs after reading it. I’ll do a separate blog on it shortly. But this quote from the book for now:
Where does responsibility lie between those who incite to a deed and those who commit it? If the answer is that the greater and final responsibility lies with the perpetrator, then the verdict of history is incontestably, though strangely, that responsibility for the heresy of Judaism lies with the Gentiles, who from the time of the Persian kings to this century have done the bidding of the sect that devised it.
Dugin, in brief, is critiquing liberalism and capitalism and its controlled opposition Marxism. I’ve been doing the same thing for much of my adult life. See the INTRO write-up on my youtube homepage in that regard. Okay, feel free to ignore my poor video making skills and focus on the points in my writing. See THIS blog on James Lindsay that has all the links to this series.
The ‘secular christianity’ of the west, with it’s predatory usurious social darwinism within economics, is one of his primary targets (and one of mine). Again, read the book above for who flipped Christianity and brought this dismal suicidal condition to civilization. So I agree with Dugin that international capitalism in its present structure has to be stopped–it’s simply a matter of who stops it–do you really want the WEF and Klaus Schwab to be the ones to end it? And this isn’t me saying Dugin’s view is the way forward.
One of the primary performative contradictions in economic liberalism is the forced and coercive illiberalism that it must use to function. It’s disrupted every civilization on earth via violence and bloodshed as an avenue of exploiting labor and controlling resources–it sees this bloodshed and violence as progress! And no Keith…the USA is not the core of this poison per se: Jerusalem was when the Levite priesthood created a racist and supremacist creed–read the book above. Moreover, Jerusalem became famous because of Akhenaten (Moses) and Yuya (Joseph) who helped create the Levitical priesthood which had its roots in the city of Egypt called Mallevi. Digression aside, we saw this contradiction blatantly displayed via pandemic economics which wiped out the bottom of the social pyramid on an unprecedented scale while transferring the wealth of the commons and the nations treasuries into the pockets of the oligarchs. In a sickening display of state propaganda the whores in the MSM are now telling us that everything is just fine and that the economy is back to normal! See the documentary HyperNormisation for a schooling on cognitive dissonance! Of course, any sane person who has had their life wiped out and freedom taken away sees this for exactly what it is: manipulative lies of the banking cartels using their state-run media.
International communism and materialist neoliberal economics(zionism) are two sides of the same toxic coin. They both share a progressive view of time; modernity, atheism, they both usurp or pervert spirituality and traditionalism, they are both antagonistic to nationalism and conservative ethics. I’d mention at this point the Orwellian doublespeak of neoliberalism when its politicians say they are defending democracy: what they are defending is their totalizing control over civilization and if one is critical of this plutocracy then one is ‘anti-democratic’ (and anti-semitic). …Again, a sickening abuse of reality within word games. BTW: Keith touches on the Kali-Yuga. Someone, at some point in the those writings, changed the timeframe from millennia to ridiculous notions of extended timelines. In my research, and understanding, the Kali-Yuga is likely based on the ‘cycle-of the precession of the equinox/zodiac’. So, about 25/26,000 years. I suspect the myths of the fall of Atlantis and what is now known as the Younger-Dryas cataclysm was a halfway point in that cycle. But it’s controversial and speculative so I’ll leave it at that. Do your own research. As a christian gnostic, I hold a cyclic view of time and, much like the Egyptians, I hold that we go through endless cycles of creation and destruction here–which has led humanity, in general, to suffer from mass-collective subconscious trauma. My own sense is that the amnesia associated with the reincarnation template is not necessarily associated with this trauma but rather manipulation involved within the moon-matrix reincarnation grid itself–speculative, of course.
I agree that we need a post-secular order but not theocracy. For the most part I share his view about a return to simpler sane ecological living. Will we get any of this? Of course not! Why not? Read the book linked above by Douglas Reed. I do think it’s a mis-naming when the lame-stream-media frames Dugin as far-right. Pretty well everyone is a NAZI according to those on the upper-left-authoritarian-political compass. Of course, those fake leftists up in the green corner are the real Nazi’s…But to be fair they likely interpret from a critique of Heidegger who was associated with the national-socialists in Germany. But he was an existential phenomenologist who rejected Husserl’s idealist views on subjectivity–the essences of the thing in itself (Platos forms). So, in that specific sense, Heidegger was more of a modernist.
Whether we get a compromised return to his meridian zones (multi-polar-politics) will be an interesting thing to watch for but I doubt that it would end up being healthy-a definite maybe. Likely not at all possible within a ‘demiurgic construct’…It will be interesting to see who wins: his view of a culturally instantiated Dasein or whether we get the disembodied trans-world-person interfaced with the A.I. machine. There is also that pesky Messianic view of time. At any rate, I’ve never been fond at all of anything associated with the Phoenix symbolism. In that aspect alone I would reject Dugin.
NOTE*: I have no idea how Reed could fail to see that the Torah is historical fiction and therefore makes Christianity false (in its normative iterations). I’m not sure if he had access to the history of the 18th dynasty which was the root of Judaism as we know it today. So the semitic branches of that dynasty created Judaism based on the spirituality of Egypt. Below is one evidence for this. Pictures of the Egyptian and Jewish temples.
I guess this was inevitable. I have mentioned him before in part 1 of my Conservative Critique of Capitalism series linked HERE..
I’m addressing his talk in this video. Wiki says he was part of the new atheist movement so this is a rather odd setting. Likely the enemy of my enemy is my friend situation although it’s true some people have honest worldview changes throughout their life. I shall not comment on his inner motivations.
The first thing I want to draw your attention to in the video is the symbolism. The Lion couldn’t be more obvious but much more subtle is the shield which always represents the Serpents Tongue within spirituality; we also have the crown. So this is as perfect a depiction one will find of Yaldabaoth who was always depicted as part serpent and part lion. Of course, Yaldabaoth IS the King Of This Earth. Yaldabaoth IS the false Christ who creates every manner of distortion and mimicry of the Living Aeon Christ. It is Yaldabaoth who will eventually personify as Israel’s Messiah.
The distortion, in this case, is a renewal of events in Germany in the 20’s and 30’s happening today in (T)A MERI KA– which, as I’ve pointed out many times now, means– Egypt’s spirit. It’s why the Egyptian obelisk sits in D.C. and why the all seeing eye of Re is on the American dollar. See my Judaism Is Egyptian Spirituality blog. In America today the Jews hold extraordinary levers of power in every place that matters– whether politics, finance, courts, big pharma, media, sports, entertainment, etc., and I say this as a reference to matter of FACTS. I’m not saying anything in this regard that isn’t 100% true and provable. More controversial is the demographic in Germany mid-century which I would argue was the same– as far as who held most of the levers of power. Upping the ante on the controversy is the idea that some semitic people have been rulers throughout history–the descendants of the semitic branches of the 18th dynasty. You can check out the writings of Miles Mathis in this regard as no one has documented this better. And no, I’m not sure where the fakery ends but there’s enough of it happening to be of genuine concern.
The same dynamics that were within Germany between different socialist schools of political theory are front and centre in America today. Lindsay’s diatribe in the video against Marx is no different than the arguments that happened in Germany during the 20th century. In this video the critique is from a platform that can only correctly be described as Christian Fascist. So it’s a replay of *fascist and socialist ideological antipathies that happened in Germany. People should muse on what I’m suggesting here rather than dismiss in total what I’m saying. If it’s true this century is now on repeat mode ( it is) then we should be able to gauge what worked and what didn’t when it comes to countering the oligarchs. Did labour succeed in the 20th century? Hardly. They were infiltrated on every level and by late-capitalism’s neoliberalism everyone was atomized into self-employed islands with a population of one–this group couldn’t organize a tea party of two for a resistance! Did National Socialism succeed? Hardly, it looks like a dismal failure unless viewed from the ethno-nationalist state of Israel in 1948–a strange victorious inheritance indeed! I concede I’m pessimistic as those were the days where we had a chance but we were outmanoeuvred and outplayed on the civilizational chessboard in that century–dismally so. I’d also argue that the pen is no longer mightier than the sword with the oligarchs now having complete control of the algorithms. Combined that with anti-christ being wholly acceptable by the tribe juxtaposed to the ultimate crime of critiquing jewish power and politics. In my view, the creation of the Nazi’s was a pre-emptive strike against the universal truth of Christian Gnosticism that is now once again arisen upon the earth in voices like mine and the tribe KNOWS we are peaceful loving people and it’s not possible for them to refute the truth of christian gnosticism so they have backwashed and made us guilty by wrongful association –the all critique of Judaism is Nazi trope.
As a Christian Gnostic, I’ve done many blogs critiquing materialism and Marx’s economic and political ideology. The difference between myself and Lindsay is twofold in that I’m not a materialist or atheist (is he?) and I in no way support fascist ideologies. It was the Roman Church that turned a Republic into a crumbling fascist empire and made surfs out of Christian’s while blocking them from direct access to scripture so they wouldn’t and couldn’t get direct access to the corrupt nature of Yahweh and Judaism. The only difference between that initial roman church and the American church is that the American one is in outright denial about the nature of Yahweh; although, as the video shows, it’s every bit as fascist. It’s true, though, that the RCC protected the character of Yahweh and they did that, in part, by murdering the Gnostics and the Marcionite’s–this is evidence, in my view, that semites involved in the creation of the RCC KNEW what they were doing and WHY! They also acted as proxies looting Egypt and decimating knowledge held in Alexandria; although Caesar, in my opinion, might have had reason to destroy the knowledge held in Alexandria if he was inkahoots with Cleopatra about hiding the truth about the 18th dynasty and the roots of Judaism–Abraham to Moses being 4-generations within the 18th dynasty.
Okay, tangents aside, the primary point I’d like to make surrounds the question of How Shall We Live? And in this context the question is aimed at Christendom. But first, I have always understood the futility of my arguments towards Christendom as they will dismiss everything I say and would prefer to murder me for calling Yahweh the devil (while embracing predatorial usurious economics). But Truth, writ large, is buried within Christianity so that’s why I bother. Lindsay, and American Christians in general, believe fascism and usury is the proper answer to the question of how christians should live! They rant endlessly about Marx while embracing fascist ideology in economics! Let me assure you, the money-lending cartels LOVE this type of critique as it’s embedded within a false dichotomy (civilizational dialectics) and dismisses or never critiques predatory and usurious economics! In my opinion, it’s an intentional ‘missing of the mark’.
The truth is that Christians, no matter where and when they have lived, should not have moved beyond a simple agrarian lifestyle within small agora type communities. So small C conservatism and capitalism is as far as Christendom should have gone. Certainly, american usurious capitalism is the antithesis of any sane christian economics, so it’s no surprise it’s once again morphing into christian fascism–rotten roots produce rotten fruit. I would agree that there are still tiny islands of sane christian economics like The Amish. There are even the odd few like Anthony Migchels who understand that cap/com is a dialectic of the tribe. Oh, yes, Canaan (ADA) now has another Pierre extolling the efficacy of Bitcoin as the solution to the New Agora for the right. More dismal ponzi scheme shilling, I think, and another replicating of the small C resistance 100-years ago covered in this series that failed dismally. Predatory usurious economics 99… decent loving christian alternatives to the tribes economic mind in the last 100-years 1…Outscored and outplayed in every way imaginable. See a video linked HERE called A Libertarian Distopia where the female video maker correctly documents the insanity of crypto. And yes, she can be correct about that and totally wrong in her metaphysical beliefs and, of course, as a christian gnostic she IS wrong about what she believes about metaphysics, in my opinion. My vlog on crypto called Re-Imagining The Penny.
NOTE*: This blog is not a treatise on the meanings of communism, fascism, and neoliberalism. A bit more detail there and I cough up some solutions for Christendom in that blog so I won’t repeat them here.
‘not everyone wants to rule the world, but in reality only one group has that ambition’
Surely this will be the Messiah? Is this not where all the trajectories are pointing to? One Corp. to rule them all?
Wouldn’t this chief CEO want direct access to your thoughts and wouldn’t it want your basic survival needs to be thoroughly dependent on its ‘charity’? The latter being instantiated via a Bitcoin like interface with your mind? I’ve said in the past that Minority Report had some of the best guesses about the future and we are seeing that assessment turn out to be true–to some degree anyway.
My sense is that the archaic interpretation of a Messiah and associated practices from antiquity will not be at all appealing to the evolved Messiah CEO. Perhaps he’ll (She?) will tolerate it within a Walt Disney like theme show somewhere in the middle-east where digitized humans can pay to see reenacted archaic *sexual blood rituals performed. But, again…it would only be tolerated as an historic amusement by the chief CEO whose primary mode of operation is finance–and big big finance at that!
I’ve continually suggested in my blogging on axial age religions that these religions, in most of their forms, were nothing but a cover and shelter for the ‘money masters’. If this is true, and I argue it is, then it would explain why the chief CEO will see religion as a secondary amusement while the primary focus will be on BIG finance and trade. It’s worth repeating some coincidences from my previous blogs: that the first major money operatives in antiquity used public ledgers and metal mining as a means (think Bitcoin) and in the 14th century the first modern gun technology arose with the first development of a central bank–the rise of central banking (institutionalized usury) went hand in fist with what is now called the military industrial complex. In todays world the sports and entertainment complex is a signifiant branch of the MIC (renewed Bread and Circuses).
Okay…so here we go. Most people who blog on this subject presuppose via faith (most always irrational presuppositions) that their particular religious views are the entirely correct ones. On this site I’ve argued beyond all reasonable doubt (sufficient reason) that Judaism is both false historically and cosmologically–that it is the religion of a corrupted demiurge–therefore Christianity and Islam fail, too, in their hermeneutics. See HERE and HERE for arguments along these lines. I have argued, though, that certain bloodlines are real and, that it’s these **‘nephilim archon spook’ bloodlines who control the flow of civilization upon the earth. One of the major cards in the bloodline deck today is Don Drumpf (666) and HERE…
The rape of Eve by Yaldabaoth and the archons went through these lines: Cain>Kenite>Canaanite>Edomites>Idmeans>Pharisees>Rabbis>Jews…
I’ve suggested that the Donald is from the Scottish line that were the remnants of the Knights Templar who ended up in Scotland after their alleged persecution and that these bloodlines were descended from the Roman Elites who were interbred with Egyptian/Phoenician Elites. This goes back to the 18th dynasty 33 centuries ago and this is one of the reasons those two numbers are so important to these ELItes today. But very few understand that Judaism as we know it was invented/created shortly after the 18th dynasty and was the ‘borrowing’ of Egyptian spirituality to suit the agendas of the Semitic branch of those bloodlines. In my view and research the stories from Abraham to Moses occurred in FOUR generations during the 18th dynasty. See Judaism is Egyptian Spirituality.
As a Christian Gnostic, I’m not buying the religious fervour surrounding Trump by Zionists and Christian Zionists (and Islamicist’s) that is very akin to the fervour surrounding the supposed Messiah Sabbatai Zevi in 1666–what I’ve come to call the ‘carnival barker religious grift show’. This is more manipulation and neuroticism embedded within civilizational dialectics and endless false dichotomies. My sense is that it will be well to the end of this century before Mr. O(M)NECORP makes his appearance on the world stage. I say this because the Bible and Koran are false and are creations of the money-master cartels which are the property of what Christian Gnostics call the ARCHONS. The chief archon was known as Yaldabaoth the demiurge and it was a liar from its Genesis and therefore its religions are lies also. But these books are used to engineer civilization over time. So although the books are false they can be used by the archons to ‘come true’ but not in any of the ways associated with the three primary cults they created–we’ve seen century after century how these 3-cults have manipulated humanity via false prophecy–a manipulation rife with bloodshed and murder.
NOTE*: see THIS video where Tsarion talks about Solomon’s temple with its concomitant sexual symbolism.
The Egyptian Temple:
From Astle’s, The Babylonian Woe:
It had come to be the silver injected into circulation by private persons, who by then, in reality, if not so far as went general appearances, through manipulation of that inverted pyramid of ledger credit page entry money erected on the silver they claimed to hold in reserve, as apex, had now completely usurped the essential power of the temple: the creation and allocation of the unit of exchange.
Thus the total design of the city which derived from the power of rejection or preferment formerly exercised through the money creative powers of the god through king and priesthood, fell into their hands, and where in earlier days a devoted priesthood exercised its prerogative of preferment through money creation, towards the people living a god-ordered and pious life, each man in harmony with his neighbours, (57) those new international forces that now exercised the reality of such rule from the counting houses, contemptuous of all kingly and godly power as undoubtedly they were, but still needing such power as front behind which they might shelter in order to better pursue their nefarious purposes, spread hate and suspicion, each man of his brother.
Secretly promoting the concept of “Permanent Revolution” as being most suited towards the maintenance of their control, no sooner did stable and natural god-ordered government come again, then, feverishly digging at its roots, they tore it down. Out of break-up of family and home, out of lust and drunkenness, out of the people living in disorder, and love giving way to hate, they throve.
Where they saw signs of nobility and natural aristocracy in living and thought, returning, financial preferment was automatically withdrawn… He who was consumed with animal desires and ignobility of purpose, was their man and eagerly their slave, and willing betrayer of his brethren into what was planned for them by his master.
Even though certain priesthood continued to maintain vigorous temple organizations long after the international control came about such as was exercised by the great Babylonian financial houses, it may safely be assumed that such temple organizations continued to exist only on account of their deference to these new controllers of international exchanges…
In a similar manner did the Egyptian priesthood defer to the power of Joseph as Vizier to the Pharaoh; as a result of which, while all other lands in Egypt were expropriated and returned to State ownership and administration, its lands, such as appertained to the temples, were not touched in any way. (58)
Thus was a corrupted and short-sighted priesthood brought to acquiesce in the enthronement of its enemies, and the enemies of the god it represented.
For Joseph clearly was agent of an external Money Power, and while the Pharaoh leaned on him, he and that force behind him were clearly the rulers… de facto if not de jure, they were in the place of the Pharaoh…
AND SO IT CONTINUES…
NOTE**: I mean ‘fallen ruling (spook) agents of chaos’. SPOOK: political, economic, and religious agents who usually gain their income from the many alphabet agencies the world over. These agencies are branches of the usurious banking cartels who rule the earth.